| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 24 post(s) |

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1728
|
Posted - 2015.11.30 15:28:09 -
[1] - Quote
Will there be devblog about the changes, I lost track a bit ...
To the experts who have followed, what is the effective change for relic and data sites value-wise?
From my relic expedition yesterday I recognize that data sites are still ignored by explorers and polluting systems ...
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1786
|
Posted - 2015.12.06 08:25:24 -
[2] - Quote
Terminalia Wisperrant wrote:The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick.
Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. This, so much. But I guess some code has to be written or changed for that ...
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1786
|
Posted - 2015.12.06 19:12:14 -
[3] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:Terminalia Wisperrant wrote:The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick.
Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. It is an indirect form of PVP, also if you have to hack all the containers it will only be a matter of time before there is more bitching about crap loot or nothing in a container which they had to spend time hacking. So they will either want fewer cans per site or better loot per can. Both of which will cause the value of the loot to drop even further. So no don't make all cans unscannable, keep them as is, if you want your loot to be worth anything. Actually making cans unscannable increases the value of the (good) loot. Because people who cherry pick now, will need more time and maybe get annoyed running the sites ...
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1786
|
Posted - 2015.12.07 20:52:28 -
[4] - Quote
Estella Osoka wrote:Terminalia Wisperrant wrote:The most pressing issue right now is cherrypicking. Even though in my exploration corp and in help channels there is a useful stigma against cherrypicking, there are still many people who do it. And many of them cherrypick not only due to some notion of increasing their own time efficiency, but mainly to stick it to the intelligent and correct explorers who tell them not to cherrypick.
Make all cans unscannable. Problem solved, all explorers everywhere benefit. No. When you are running relic/data sites in null, WH, and losec; you want to get in and out as fast as you can before someone comes in to ruin your day. If you have to hack every can, then the chances of you getting caught just went up significantly. Which is a welcome change, more dead explorers, more fun, better loot prices. 
BTW, unfinished sites despawn, but it takes about an hour iirc.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1787
|
Posted - 2015.12.08 21:37:06 -
[5] - Quote
I see, both points are valid, having more sites completed and people just leaving remains and down untouched ... not that easy to guess what will be the effect on loot value.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1879
|
Posted - 2015.12.15 21:50:15 -
[6] - Quote
Judging from the intact armor plate prices, drop rates are pretty much the same. The price increase is due to higher demand in anticipation of the citadels. If drop rates increase, price would decrease.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
1942
|
Posted - 2015.12.23 10:47:32 -
[7] - Quote
Primary This Rifter wrote:Well no, because a lot of people who were running data sites but not these before will now find these and run them.
That even seems to be the argument that Chance Ravine was making in support of moving them to signatures. Rather I would expect more explorers die trying, but IIRC they are flagged as combat sites now, not data. All what CCP did, is increasing the access barrier ... which usually increase the value of the loot.
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2001
|
Posted - 2016.01.03 08:13:05 -
[8] - Quote
Put a bunch of rangefinding arrays on your ship if not yet done so and try again, also use sisters probes ... the sleeper caches need very high scanning strength > 100
I'm my own NPC alt.
|

Tipa Riot
Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation
2141
|
Posted - 2016.01.29 21:04:05 -
[9] - Quote
Inquisiteur Karamasov wrote:I did exploration during a long time before odyssey and a bit after during the can spread fest (so happy its gone)
In my point of view is before odyssey exploration was a really rewarding activity, after odyssey a lot less. So what change ?
Easy, now exploration is easy to do easy to start and safe (as lomg you take care). Even the scanning part is a lot more easy and while i love it become a non-combat activity it need to have more risk.
Because at the end the only real thing chamge in the exploration is it become more easy so a lot (but really a lot ) more people do it so the value pf the loot go down and no matter how you change the loot inside the site the value will jist go down because too much people can do it easely Except the loot value is going up steadily ...
I'm my own NPC alt.
|
| |
|